Monthly Archives: December 2014

Positive acceptability for investigational contraceptive ring reported by Population Council

Endocrinology_OBGYN

The Population Council published new research in the November issue of the journal Contraception demonstrating that an investigational one-year contraceptive vaginal ring containing Nestorone® and ethinyl estradiol was found to be highly acceptable among women enrolled in a Phase 3 clinical trial. Because the perspectives of women are critical for defining acceptability, researchers developed a theoretical model based on women’s actual experiences with this contraceptive vaginal ring, and assessed their overall satisfaction and adherence to instructions for ring use. In this trial, researchers also measured continuation of ring use for up to one year.

“Understanding the factors that influence women’s satisfaction with and acceptability of a contraceptive method helps researchers and product developers design and test products that better meet their health and family planning needs,” said Ruth Merkatz, Director, Clinical Development, Center for Biomedical Research at the Population Council. “Our results add to the growing body of evidence documenting the acceptability of our investigational contraceptive vaginal ring. With the development of this model, we can continue studying women’s preferences for this and other vaginal rings to ensure that introductory and educational efforts are user-centric and responsive to women’s needs.”

Designing and Testing the Acceptability Model

The acceptability model was developed based on four objective domains of contraceptive vaginal ring use: ease of use (e.g., ease of inserting and removing the ring, remembering the schedule); side effects; expulsion of the ring and feeling the ring while wearing it (including awareness of the ring during sexual intercourse); and changes to sexual activity, frequency, or pleasure. A questionnaire was developed to assess these domains as well as overall satisfaction and adherence to instructions for use. Continuation of ring use was also evaluated.

The model was tested among 1,036 women enrolled in a Phase 3 clinical trial of the Council’s investigational one-year contraceptive vaginal ring. They were given a questionnaire that measured the domains of ring use, overall satisfaction, and adherence to the regimen. The acceptability questionnaire was integrated into a study protocol across 12 trial sites in Latin America, the United States, Europe, and Australia over three years.

The study protocol was approved by the Council’s Institutional Review Board and each site’s ethical committee. All women provided informed consent. The questionnaires were translated into each site’s local language, and were administered at the beginning of each woman’s third monthly cycle of use, and again after one year (or at the time of study discontinuation).

Findings from the Acceptability Study and Recommendations for Providers and Researchers

Eighty-nine percent of women were satisfied with the one-year ring. Women who reported being satisfied found the ring easy to insert and remove, and did not experience changes in sexual pleasure or frequency of intercourse. Additionally, women who reported satisfaction with the ring were twice as likely to use the method correctly compared to women who reported dissatisfaction and 5 times as likely to use the ring for a full year. Women who reported dissatisfaction (11%) were more likely to report feeling the ring while wearing it and during intercourse, and to experience side effects associated with use.

The researchers made three recommendations for healthcare professionals, clinical trial leaders, and community healthcare workers (e.g., community health extension workers, nurses, and midwives) who counsel women considering or using a contraceptive vaginal ring method:

  • Practitioners are strongly encouraged to inform women about the possibility of experiencing hormonal and non-hormonal side effects, and counsel on managing side effects;
  • Comfort with inserting and removing the ring should be addressed during personal counseling with women, regardless of prior experiences with other vaginal ring products; and
  • Guidance about feeling the ring or possibly expelling it is also necessary. With support from informed providers or experienced users, women can practice insertion to make sure they are inserting the ring correctly.

The researchers recommended continued research to broaden the evidence supporting the use of the model. Additional studies in other geographic regions are recommended, such as sub-Saharan Africa, where a long-acting, reversible method under the woman’s control has the potential to be an important new contraceptive option.

About the Investigational Nestorone® and Ethinyl Estradiol Contraceptive Vaginal Ring

The investigational one-year contraceptive vaginal ring is a long-acting, reversible contraceptive designed to provide protection against pregnancy for up to one year. It is currently in the late stages of clinical development.

The ring contains the progestin Nestorone®, an investigational new chemical entity that has been shown to be effective in preventing ovulation, as well as ethinyl estradiol, an FDA-approved, marketed estrogen product. Roughly 2¼ inches in diameter, the investigational one-year ring is soft and flexible, and women can easily insert and remove the ring without the assistance of a healthcare professional.

As demonstrated in clinical trials, the investigational one-year ring is designed to prevent ovulation by releasing a low dose of hormones through the vaginal walls and into the bloodstream. It is left in place for 21 days and removed for 7 days. A single ring can be used for up to 13 cycles (one year). Because it is designed to be effective for 13 cycles and designed so that refrigeration is not required, the investigational one-year ring may be a suitable option for women in developing countries who lack convenient access to a health care facility or pharmacy, and in areas where regular electricity outages – or lack of electricity – are a fact of life.

Adapted by MNT from original media release

 

Clinical consultations for fertility problems no greater for women with celiac disease

OBGYN

Women with celiac disease present with fertility problems no more often than women in the general population, according to a new study in Gastroenterology1 , the official journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

“Despite inconsistent findings from small studies, concern has been raised that celiac disease may cause infertility,” said lead study author Nafeesa N. Dhalwani, PhD, from the University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. “Celiac patients should rest assured; our findings indicate that women with celiac disease do not report fertility problems more often than women without celiac disease.”

Researchers conducted a large population-based cohort study, analyzing more than 2 million women of childbearing age in the United Kingdom, to compare the rates of new clinically recorded fertility problems in groups of women with and without celiac disease. The findings show women with celiac disease do not have a greater likelihood of fertility problems, either before or after diagnosis of celiac disease.

However, rates of infertility were 41 percent higher among women diagnosed with celiac disease when they were 25-29 years old, compared to women in the same age group without the disease. Dr. Dhalwani provides guidance on these findings: “It is important to recognize that this represented only a very small increase in the number of women consulting with fertility problems — if we followed women between ages 25-29 years over a one-year period, presentation with fertility problems would occur in one of every 100 women without celiac disease, but in 1.5 of every 100 women with celiac disease. The fact that this increase was not seen in women of the same age with undiagnosed celiac disease indicates that it is unlikely to represent a biological impact of the condition on fertility. It may instead be related to heightened concern that may prompt earlier consultation if women experience delays in conception. This does, however, warrant further assessment.”

While undiagnosed celiac disease is likely to be an underlying cause of unexplained infertility for some women, these findings indicate that most women with celiac disease, either undiagnosed or diagnosed, do not have a substantially greater likelihood of clinically recorded fertility problems than women without celiac. Therefore, screening when women initially present with fertility problems may not identify a significant number of women with celiac disease, beyond the general population prevalence.

Previous studies associating infertility with celiac disease included small numbers of women attending infertility specialist services and subsequently screened for celiac disease, so they may not be representative of the general population. This is the largest study to assess the association between celiac disease and fertility problems to date with data on more than 2 million women over a period of 20 years.

Celiac disease affects about 1 percent of the population in North America and Western Europe, with women constituting about 60 to 70 percent of the clinically diagnosed population. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition which can result in intestinal malabsorption and prevents the body from collecting nutrients as food passes through the small intestine. The primary treatment for celiac disease is the strict following of a gluten-free diet.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/286421.php